mcevin
Member
57
|
# Posted: 2 Jan 2008 10:55:48
Reply
Oh for heaven's sake! It's what you DO with it, not how BIG it is! My mommy told me anything more than a mouthful is JUST WASTED!
So like, is a big black 12x12 that never gets out of his pants better than a li'l ol' 6-incher IN MY ASS? I don't THINK so.
I mean, I know how important the cuck fantasy scene is: "My dimpy wick, wait, wimpy dick, is too small to satisfy my wife, so she has to have a REAL MAN, etc." and I'm ALL FOR IT. But for me, I have never had a guy who's DICK was too small. The most important sex-organ is the BRAIN, not the cuck, I mean COCK.
I've met a lot of small brained guys who couldn't satisfy me. Brains too small to think up anything better than "Let's Fuck." But cock size? Not been a problem so far...
Love,
Jamie
|
Sh1n3r
Member
63
|
# Posted: 7 Jan 2008 17:58:24 · Edited by: Sh1n3r
Reply
To add to what Jaimie and ShrinkingViolet wrote, I've actually always had a bit of a problem with causing pain to my lovers, and I am average sized, so I can't imagine that the really big boys find it easy to hook up. That said, I've known a few girls who really liked size, especially after having had a few kids. So preferences differ when it comes to cock size, and the extremes of size are hard to find matches for.
The "big cock thing" is really more a matter of male rivalry and male hierarchy than anything else. It's a quick and easy way to guess at how virile someone is, and how you rank relative to them in terms of your masculinity. This male-male hierarchy is an important element of cuck-play. Cuckoldry works by playing alpha-beta caste membership against relationship commitment and intimacy symbols, so hierarchy constantly overrides reciprocity.
The big cock fetish can be used to symbolize all of that. It represents what makes the superior male superior, and it represents the desirability of that male as a romantic rival. It is an unchangeable physical attribute, so we are helpless. There is nothing we can do about it. The bull has a natural right to override the boundaries of the marriage, and the cuck has a natural place as a subordinate, and struggle or argument is futile, because the physical symbols are clear and permanent.
Visible hugeness also makes big cocks a good target for phallic worship, but really it's the *idea* of phallic potency that's being worshiped. An unnaturally huge cock is rare and surprising, which helps to make it symbolic of that potency. Against that, we have visible symbols of commitment and affiliation like wedding rings, bridal gowns and family settings.
So huge cocks become a symbol or sign of masculinity, desirability and alpha-status. Some of us play against racist in-group/out-group taboos by also using skin color as a sign of these things. Since we communicate a lot of this cuck-culture by swapping photographs, these visible and easy-to-determine symbolic markers make it possible for us to build our scenes in codes we all understand.
In reality, or in person, it's all attitude though. "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." You don't need those visible markers as much when you are dealing with real people. A bull with a smaller cock and a commanding attitude could totally command a cuck couple with a guy whose dick was huge, but who was meek and easy to control, becoming more so the more his huge dick was beaten, mocked, denied and rejected. It is nice when your real-life playmates also embody your masturbatory fetishes, but it isn't absolutely necessary. It what you are between the ears that counts, more than between the legs.
Small-cock bulls can always just switch the aesthetic on big-cock cucks. In ancient Athens, with its male-male erotic culture, they certainly had preferences about cocks, but they preferred smaller cocks, thinking them more refined, noble, beautiful and god-like. Big cocks struck them as ridiculous, animalistic, foolish, barbaric, etc. In most cultures where they have mythical creatures who are impish, foolish, driven by appetites and who are not very smart, these creatures will be represented as having huge penises, sometimes bigger than the rest of their bodies.
A clown might be shown with a huge penis in ancient art, but not an olympian (whether god or athlete). When a monk is depicted in oriental art as an object of religious respect, no bulge of a penis is visible beneath their robes (though they may have a "Yang"-symbolic object around them). When a monk is shown with a huge penis, boinking a girl, he usually has a semi-retarded-looking grin on his face as well. He may be drooling, and is often shown as ugly or diseased. In this kind of art, a big phallus is a symbol of ridicule and mockery of monks in general.
So you can always flip the two poles of any comparison and change which one is fetishized positively vs which is rejected negatively. We are already doing this, I think... The association of huge cock size and Black ethnicity was, I think, originally part of the racist dehumanization of Black as animals under slavery. Black males were supposed to be big muscled animals valued for their physical performance, hugely endowed and bursting with libido towards white women that had to be contained at all costs. Many white cuck couples are gratefully preserving the stereotype of what Black males "are", but then they gleefully violate the sex taboo, enjoying all the excitement of those historically-charged stereotypes, which create the distinction we can base a hierarchy on.
Some other cuck couples are coming online too - relaxed and confident Black couples who "toy" with racism, playing with all of the worst racist stereotypes in our society, with the help of a willing white bull to bring the "racist" heat into play. So long as you can define two categories of male and rank one about the other, you can play. The female player can either go alpha, and exploit the cuck as a sexless helper/servant, or go beta, sharing the same social status as her husband, but to be powerlessly "claimed" and "owned" by her bull master, "unable" to disobey or to escape his masterful claim on her.
Cock size is just one way of "anchoring" the status difference. Skin pigmentation is another. It is useful if the dimension you use to define the status difference between the males is a fixed physical attribute, but not necessary. Desires themselves can be "proof" of status. The wife's accusation that "You *want* him to fuck me, don't you?" is enough to brand the husband a cuck, regardless of cock size.
|
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy | Compliance with 18 U.S.C. § 2257 |
Customer Service
