| Author |
Message |
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 15:09:30 · Edited by: kimlane
Reply
PalmCoastCouple now it is bold and all caps come on just tell me why already is it a vision thing? I mean that would exsplan why you don't
see any one else's point of view maybe you cant read our font try the zoom feature in your OS that should help
yea 4 pages
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 15:27:18 · Edited by: kimlane
Reply
Quoting: PalmCoastCouple All we're saying is that this Marlboro.com. If you smoke Camels perhaps Camel.com is more appropriate.
ok fine taunting aside so then what are the variations you all are ok with
what are the red's, lights, ultra lights, menthols, light menthols, ultra light menthols, plus 100's and 52's of all said and all i missed. or is some one only smoking if it is reds 100's from a hard pack?
|
sarahtv
Member
142
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 15:39:05 · Edited by: sarahtv
Reply
Ah jeeZ here we go again, another person forcing his view on people, not able to accept any variations on a theme.
It has to be this way and no other etc etc.
palm there are many ways people may combine cuckolding and fantasies etc, if u dont like a particlular slant dont read the thread, its quite easy.
theres plenty of stuff here for all sorts im sure you will find stuff to your taste. look at the diff topics etc.
but dont impose your view on others who may have different tastes to you , stop trying to police this site.
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
252
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 15:57:23 · Edited by: PalmCoastCouple
Reply
sarahtv and/or kimlane... if either of you could cease your pontifications and stay on topic, would you please explain to the board how this thread of a guy that wants to be gang-banged in the ass by a group of men relates to the Cuckold lifestyle?
http://www.cuckoldplace.com/34_48475_0.html
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 16:10:04
Reply
PalmCoastCouple nope I cant. He did not even bother to post that he was married and wanted his wife's lovers to do him, if he had would that have been ok? really please answer.
I have found that sissy,feminzation and "forced" bi/gay themes are a very common part of cuckold fantasy not sure how much of it carries over to real life to expect that none of it shows up here is just silly.
So again what variation is ok with you or is it really just one way or no way as far as you go.
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 16:16:39
Reply
PalmCoastCouple as a note there is a ton of off topic posts out there some of it with no connection to cuckold at all not even a thin one you could be going after the people posting "hot teen pics" or "big black cock pics" instead you go for post that are related but just not what you like.
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
252
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 16:16:40 · Edited by: PalmCoastCouple
Reply
Quoting: kimlane nope I cant
Thanks for the civil answer! Now... here's the problem.
A member logs in to a Cuck site expecting Cuck material. He clicks on a thread labeled "I want to get fucked", thinking... hey... some hotwife looking for a bull.
But... NOPE... you end up reading about some gay guy wanting to take it up the ass. Major buzz kill that's totally off topic...
People say "if you don't like it, don't read it"... but we both know when you hit that stuff it's too late. You can't un-read it. It never should have been here to begin with. It wasn't Cuck material.
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 16:19:26
Reply
Quoting: PalmCoastCouple A member logs in to a Cuck site expecting Cuck material. He clicks on a thread labeled "I want to get fucked", thinking... hey... some hotwife looking for bull. But... NOPE... you end up reading about some gay guy wanting to take it up the ass. Major buzz kill that's totally off topic... People say "if you don't like it, don't read it"... but we both know when you hit that stuff it's too late. You can't un-read it. It never should have been here to begin with. It wasn't Cuck material.
you are very right and sadly every time i try to brig up proper labeling of post no one cares.
|
smalldickedwimp
Member
1063
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 16:27:51
Reply
free just isn't what it used to be.
i hear paid sites have no problem staying on topic.
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
252
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 16:28:24
Reply
Quoting: kimlane you are very right and sadly every time i try to brig up proper labeling of post no one cares.
Common ground!!! Holy shit!!!! 
Look... I'm really not trying to be an ass. I'm just one of many that feels the core content has drifted away from the Cuck theme into a dozen other fetishes. That's all.
MBC is supposedly working on some Ignore features... and maybe better thread labeling would help... I dunno. I'd just like to see it get back toward Cuckworld and less emphasis on all the other fetishes. I'm going to go surf some porn...
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 16:36:39
Reply
Not really as an answer to PalmCoastCouple all means enjoy your porn. but I would love to see a labels system like most erotic fiction has
just a simple letter or abbreviation set up that could be added after a post tittle
so
http://www.cuckoldplace.com/34_48475_0.html
would be labled "i want to get fucked OT g/bi" meaning with off topic gay/bi content
|
subcuckold
Member
50
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 17:33:58
Reply
it just makes myself laugh to think what a PURE cuckold site could mean... ¿Just a married woman with another guy who is not her husband?
You only get a kick out of that in two ways:
- through the humiliation of the husband (enjoyed by husbands, wives or potential bulls).
- through the humiliation of the wife, seen as a slut (enjoyed by husbands, wives or bulls).
From the feminist point of view... ¿don't you think cuckold captions might be found offensive?. Let alone religions...
¿Or maybe cuckoldry is just awe inspiring, such an heroic lifestyle and that's the reason people come here? People come here because it goes beyond some boundaries, because they/we are looking for transgression...
To solve the problem of some people being offended i think it might help to use the codes "hum" (for humiliation), "incest", "forcedgay", ", etc that are used for sex stories, right under the title of the thread?
I can't stand the "cut off penis" thread, for instance, but i just don't visit it. I guess that the people who asks for changes, are asking for something to help them to find what they are looking for. I hope they are not asking for the "essence" of the forum, looking for the purity of cuckoldplace.com...
A last thing:here you can find the secret cause of flame wars.
|
sarahtv
Member
142
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 17:35:22 · Edited by: sarahtv
Reply
lol 'pontificating', i made one post in this thread lol with similar in some of the others u posted in, i felt in a reasonable manner. to be honest i felt your posts were more dogmatic
but no matter
i tend to agree with kim, some good points there.
You seem to be heading towards this stand point too now, yes?
let everyone have the slant or kink (i personally would draw the line at underage stuff though) but have better labeling, so people like yourself can avoid ones u dont like, but dont stop others having there slant or differences with the cuckold theme
by the way the thread you referenced
http://www.cuckoldplace.com/34_48475_0.html
quote
'A member logs in to a Cuck site expecting Cuck material. He clicks on a thread labeled "I want to get fucked", thinking... hey... some hotwife looking for a bull.
this was in ruined husbands
maybe that should give you a bit of a clue too
but as said maybe more clearer labling may help
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
252
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 18:41:01 · Edited by: PalmCoastCouple
Reply
Quoting: sarahtv by the way the thread you referenced .... was in ruined husbands
sarah, the problem is that when you Log In to the main page and scroll down for "Latest Discussion" all you see is the thread description "I want to get fucked". There is no reference to Ruined Husbands category.
I think it's fair to say when you're on a Cuck site one should be able to expect that such a thread would be oriented to a Hotwife wanting to get laid. Not a gay guy wanting to get gangbanged in the ass.
Similarly, if the table was turned, it was a gay site and someone posted that same thread title with a description of a Hotwife wanting to be fucked, it wouldn't be appropriate content for that site.
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
sarahtv
Member
142
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 18:51:42 · Edited by: sarahtv
Reply
ok on the main page, look at the forums u can see the symbol to the left that relates to a particular forum.
now on new threads u see a little symbol to the left of each new thread, they correspond to the forum they are in.
hope that helps you out
|
sarahtv
Member
142
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 18:56:19
Reply
just reread the thread u ref about whats hes actually saying
hes used words like fantasize, submission etc
this can be linked to his paritcular cuck slant kink or whatever i dont know but could be couldnt it... so let him have his fantasy etc he may also have fantasies about his wife being fucked by another man and serving the man as well..so could be linked etc thats why its in ruined husbands
whatever let it be, just dont read that forum
|
bread
Member
4
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 21:10:12
Reply
Quoting: faggot89 bread: That's the argument many censors use to block content they don't like--that it will lead to someone turning fantasy into reality and hurting someone. But if you carry that argument to its logical conclusion, you can't have any content at all, because some nutcase might be driven over the edge by it. That's how vanilla pornography was banned--it was going to overstimulate the dusky masses, who presumably were then going to go on a rampage looking for the white women. We can't live our lives worried about some nutcase, because then what we think is controlled by the least-stable members of society. Videogames might cause one teen in a million to snap, so we must ban all videogames. Castration porn might cause one person in a million to lop his nuts off, so we can't have any of that. And so forth. But this is a chicken/egg inversion problem--it's not the porn that causes the castration, it's the fantasy (or actuality) of being castrated that causes the porn.
I agree that censorship is something that should only be used when absolutely necessary, but I do not agree with your analogy.
My line of argument would never have resulted in any but the most viscious porn categories being banned. If you must extend my view to vanilla porn, surely you must conclude that I would think that watching vanilla porn may make some people want to go out and have concensual sex with someone, which it does. Clearly, I wouldn't have a problem with that. **** (rhymes with tape) porn however, may inspire a ****. I have infact seen documentaries where rapists have described how their desires developed through that type of porn. The same for incest, under age etc.
Hence, I remain convinced that we shouldnt be feeding these desires in people.
Secondly, I think theres a difference between thought policing and realising that certain desires do no good to anyone, let alone the person who has them. Take a paedophile for example. I believe we shouldnt fuel his desires, you seem to be suggesting that its fine for him to see captions of this nature as long as he wont live them out and no-one breaks the law. If this could be GUARANTEED, then perhaps it doesnt need banning outright... perhaps. Your argument is that the "benefit" to him, and to freedom of expression, outweighs the risk to innocents. I believe that there couldnt possibly be a benefit to this person. Their fetish will never be satisfied and could feasibly ruin their life. I believe that the risk to innocents is tangible and I do not believe that we are actually opposing freedom of expression on the topic. People may still offer opinions in favour of the practice (although I doubt they really exist for this particular example) and enter into debate, they just cant post stuff that may cause actual harm.
My argument is no more about censorship than the laws against drunk driving, which is undoubtably fun and may well not kill anyone when you do it. It is not too illiberal to enforce just and meaningful rules, as long as they are to protect people from serious harm and not to censor something of which you do not approve.
To others, its a good thing that the silent majority speaks out when they dont like whats going on, pretty democratic I guess. People shouldnt be criticised for not posting more, they should be assessed on the merit of their point. Also, I have barely posted anything but I still feel I'm contributing as this topic is very important and needs genuine debate.
|
subchard
Member
134
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 21:13:47
Reply
Quoting: subcuckold t just makes myself laugh to think what a PURE cuckold site could mean... ¿Just a married woman with another guy who is not her husband?
Actually yes, since that is what cuckolding is! You need a wife having sex with a man who is not her husband as the basis for cuckolding! I don't care what else you put in (bi, sissy , bare-back v condoms, fem-dom, husband watching or left at home,etc. etc.) but if you don't at least have those basic elements it is not cuckolding!
Now I'm all for diversity and everybody enjoying their own thing since it has been well said that we are all perverts here, but I'm having a hard time seeing any link to cuckolding in the incest and daughter threads.
Just my 2 cents
|
subchard
Member
134
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 21:14:34
Reply
kim, hope this gets you closer to 5 pages!
|
faggot89
Member
346
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 22:03:24 · Edited by: faggot89
Reply
palmcoast: The thread you referenced and asked how does it relate to cuckolding has responses on it like "I get fucked up the ass from my wifes bulls and love it". which seems pretty cuckoldy to me.
|
drdneast
Member
728
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 22:44:16
Reply
When I go to a steak house for dinner, I inevitably find that those bastards are offering chicken, fish and god knows what else on the menu. I usually throw a fit, make a scene and behave like some overgrown baby off his thorazine. The audacity of those SOB's to offer anything else but dead cattle products amazes me. My wife tells me to ignore the other items and just look at the cattle side. What does she know, she's never been committed to a psychiatric unit before. "Still crazy after all these years," Paul Simon.
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 23:03:20 · Edited by: kimlane
Reply
drdneast I would think even an overgrown baby would be rather mellow on thorazine.
subchard would common law spouses be able to be in a cuckold relationship or would a ceremony be required. and thanks looks like 5 pages by morning.
drdneast thanks now i want steak
|
sirius1_nz
Member
1
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 23:42:08
Reply
Wow, we humans do love our pigeon-holes, I do not believe any two peoples kinks are the same, it seems to be a million shades of grey. The complaint seems to be that this free site should exactly match my particular flavour or I will pack up my toys and go. I avoid the titles with relatives or violent overtones, if I make a mistake and see one, I click back. If my enthusiasm for the fun is dissapated or destroyed by this then perhaps free forums are too risky read, or perhaps my enthusiasm is too fragile. Complaining about others work and efforts seems counter productive, thanks to all who maintain and contribute, if I see something not to my taste, I will move on to the next subject quitely.
|
faggot89
Member
346
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 23:48:50
Reply
drndeast: You have to read the fine-print. What you want is a steak-only house. I think there are a couple in Texas, if you're willing to travel. No fish, no poultry, no pork. No salad. No wine or beer. No A-1 sauce or other condiments. So if you really like steak, and only steak, and nothing but steak, and you only want to be surround by like-thinking steak-only eaters, with no variation, that's the place for you!
But personally, I don't go to places like that because they offer too many varieties of steak (T-bone, filet mignon, porterhouse, New York strip, etc.), and too many different styles (medium, well, rare, etc.). I have been trying to find a T-bone-medium-rare-only-steakhouse somewhere, so I'll feel really at home and safe from any unwanted differences. I don't care if I'm the only patron, just so long as there's exactly one kind of steak prepared exactly one way.
|
subchard
Member
134
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 23:49:08
Reply
KimQuoting: kimlane subchard would common law spouses be able to be in a cuckold relationship or would a ceremony be required. and thanks looks like 5 pages by morning.
IMHO common law spouses would be in an unfaithful relationship, not a cuckold one. and you're welcome!
|
faggot89
Member
346
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 23:53:00
Reply
subchard: Depending on jurisdiction, you would be incorrect in some cases and correct in others. Common-law marriages are legally binding in some states in the U.S., and in some other countries.
|
luceiia
Member
177
|
# Posted: 29 Mar 2008 00:03:31
Reply
Quoting: kimlane PalmCoastCouple now it is bold and all caps come on just tell me why already is it a vision thing? I mean that would exsplan why you don't see any one else's point of view maybe you cant read our font try the zoom feature in your OS that should help
That's a very good question, Kimlane.
You have a knack for getting right down to the meat of a particular topic.
I wonder if you'll ever get an answer. No I don't wonder, you won't.
Loved your vanilla-cuck caps!
-Luceiia
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 29 Mar 2008 00:23:55 · Edited by: kimlane
Reply
subchard faggot89 how about we figure if a common law couple bother to buy rings or similar then its cuckold if they just happened to live together but made no acknowledgment of there status then its not.
faggot89 clearly a rare porterhouse is the only steak worth eating oh hold it thats 2 cuts of meat in one how dare the cow put the strip steak right next to the filet.
luceiia thanks and i guess that and how many licks to the center of a tootsie roll pop will just continue to be some of life's mysteries
|
sarahtv
Member
142
|
# Posted: 29 Mar 2008 00:44:35
Reply
r we on 5 pages yet?
|
sarahtv
Member
142
|
# Posted: 29 Mar 2008 00:44:43
Reply
dam no
|
