| Author |
Message |
subcuckold
Member
50
|
# Posted: 27 Mar 2008 19:45:30
Reply
i thought forums were intended to have lots of subforums and threads so there's room for everyone...
|
bread
Member
4
|
# Posted: 27 Mar 2008 20:05:58
Reply
I think that there is a very clear underlying truth that this debate skirts around, although technically this is still opinion...
A persons particular likes/dislikes is up to them. If someone leaves because the dislikes outweigh their likes, thats their choice. Its fine for everyone else to stay and take their pick of the topics, as long as it harms none, it shouldnt be censored.
HOWEVER... some topics on this site are capable of causing extreme harm to innocent and/or vulnerable people. The excuse "people have different fetishes, dont be a fascist" DOES not excuse posting material that could cause this manner of harm. I am talking about under age fantasists for one. I dont care if the models are old enough, promoting an interest in underage girls IS NOT HEALTHY and may well lead to one misguided idiot (admittedly one in a thousand) actually comitting an unspeakable crime. This would not happen as much without people providing the fodder to feed this persons desires.
The same can be said about the incest stuff. Dont tell me that just because some people fancy their (often younger) relatives, that it is morally right to feed their desires. These people need help and their fantasy could cause serious harm to families, should it be discovered, and even more serious harm should it lead to any attempt to live out these desires. It simply is not acceptable.
Castration probably has a few fans here but I cant help but feel that someone will permanently disfigure themselves before wishing (for the rest of their lives) that they hadn't done it.
So thats my view. If it can cause serious harm to innocents, it is not excused by arguments regarding freedom of sexuality (an idea that in non harmful to others cases I fully support). There is no hipocrisy in criticising allusions to these vile practices. Its not illiberal to condemn them in the same way as it is not illiberal to condemn actual **** and murder.
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
251
|
# Posted: 27 Mar 2008 20:20:35
Reply
Very true, bread. We already have threads easing toward fathers molesting their underage daughers, using the Cuck shield to justify the idea. There's nothing like a little child molestation to get the old blood pumping...
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
251
|
# Posted: 27 Mar 2008 20:35:36
Reply
Quoting: darien Here we have a total pervert criticizing the fetishes of other perverts.
You missed his point.
We're ALL perverts. We know that. Different fetishes for different folks and all... everyone's cool with that.
The debate is over what's appropriate content for a Cuckold fetish site. The rest of the rhetoric is just static.
Some want Cuck material only. Others say the sky's the limit.
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 27 Mar 2008 23:07:32
Reply
please PalmCoastCouple what is with the bold?
|
faggot89
Member
344
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:09:49
Reply
bread: That's the argument many censors use to block content they don't like--that it will lead to someone turning fantasy into reality and hurting someone. But if you carry that argument to its logical conclusion, you can't have any content at all, because some nutcase might be driven over the edge by it. That's how vanilla pornography was banned--it was going to overstimulate the dusky masses, who presumably were then going to go on a rampage looking for the white women. We can't live our lives worried about some nutcase, because then what we think is controlled by the least-stable members of society. Videogames might cause one teen in a million to snap, so we must ban all videogames. Castration porn might cause one person in a million to lop his nuts off, so we can't have any of that. And so forth. But this is a chicken/egg inversion problem--it's not the porn that causes the castration, it's the fantasy (or actuality) of being castrated that causes the porn.
|
faggot89
Member
344
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:10:48
Reply
"The debate is over what's appropriate content for a Cuckold fetish site".
I totally agree, and my position is that what's appropriate for a cuckold-fetish site is content that has something to do with cuckolding, which almost everything on this site does.
|
Wifedoesfriend
Member
5
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:14:35
Reply
Instead of worrying about the bold print I think you would be better placed thinking about the point made by PalmCoastCouple & bread which are VERY good points.
In the year or so I have been a member I have seen the site slide into the more extreme side of fetish (you will see i used the word fetish & not cuckold as alot of the newer fetishes popping up do not in my view come under the cuckold title).
As Bread has stated, this could be very dangerous & even if it leads to 1 in 80,000 people (amount of members someone quoted!) getting the wrong idea that more & more people find such fetishes such as incest, dad & daughter etc as accepted & then acts on this in RL then that is 1 to many.
the other point I would to ask, is there not other sites/forums set up for such fetishes & if so why not keep them there instead of spilling over into such forums as this (not a dig just a question).
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:14:49
Reply
no really why is PalmCoastCouple text not the same font every one else uses are they to good for this fount? I just want to know please PalmCoastCouple why is every word of every post in bold
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:23:33
Reply
I love all the noncontributing lurkers coming out about this why dont you offer us something other then bitching and moaning. Make post of your own and change the amount of "good and proper cuckolding posts" in your favor. come one post a story comment some one else post you do agree with make a caption of your own post a vid of your wife post pics of your wife raise a question answer some ones question post saying you like the sight. Or do nothing i don't care is people post or not but for the love of god don't make your fist post a whiny one about how you cant use your mouse to filter the things you do and don't want to see
by the way my goal is to get this to five pages, most of the way there every one good job.
|
Wifedoesfriend
Member
5
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:27:57
Reply
Hmm, just because its my first post I am not aloud a view & because you have posted/added captions then your should have a greater voice??
Posted like a true extremist
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:31:35 · Edited by: kimlane
Reply
Wifedoesfriend no just saying it is sad this is your first contribution how ever if anything it means more then mine sense you must have been really moved by this to have finally felt the need to post.
|
Wifedoesfriend
Member
5
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:35:52
Reply
Why is it sad?
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:38:55
Reply
Wifedoesfriend well the more people contributing the richer the experience is for every one.
|
Wifedoesfriend
Member
5
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:43:00
Reply
Does not answer the question, why is it sad? I contribute by view the site on a dailly basis. If people did not then the fewer people would post, no?
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:43:16
Reply
Wifedoesfriend i mean if you have been around for a year and i guess enjoying what gets posted. You finally decide to post some thing and instead of posting some thing for others to enjoy you posted that. way to give back.
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:46:01 · Edited by: kimlane
Reply
i dont have a problem with lurkers but you did decide after some time to post and you could have given somebody whos post you did like an attaboy for your first post instead you add to an argument
|
Wifedoesfriend
Member
5
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:50:20
Reply
So if I have to post then it has to be positive & "lurkers" can not put their point across.
Also, I feel that my post was postive in the way I'd (& maybe some others by the looks of it) would like to see how this site goes & my post was my view it is you that has taken it as negative & an arguement...
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 04:55:41
Reply
well i wont say you point or option negative but really this thread is just a petty argument between people who have all already decided they were right and have no intention of changing there minds. any way who the hell am i to tell any one here what to do. i just want to get this to 5 pages
|
babyryan
Member
581
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 05:07:06
Reply
i wasn't to irritated with this thread, until i realized any time kim spends on this she is not capping pictures 
kim you rock
i hope this puts it over to 4 pages 
|
kimlane
Member
2016
Pictures: 35
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 05:13:21 · Edited by: kimlane
Reply
babyryan sorry i am a tad bit burnt out on cap'ing kind of taking it easy to day only posted 10 or so instead of the 20-50 i had been posting should be back tomorrow also i am picking new pics of me to put up to be caped. just checked it was 15
|
babyryan
Member
581
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 05:35:12
Reply
kim, i was only kidding around! i wish i could get 10 done a day, and you do that on a slow day! cant wait to see more of your pics
|
bob myers
Member
66
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 08:14:25
Reply
Why do you people care why this guy is leaving. Hell I don't like interracial because I think it smacks of racism (do you see a line on guys with green eyes that screw my wife? so why do we have one on guys with dark skin) but hell I don't look at it. I think incest is sick as is underaged and if I thought someone here was posting kiddie porn or real incest I would notify the FBI. But if it is your fantasy, well i am not here to judge fantasies. Thoughts are not illegal yet. Your fantasy may not be my scene if so I'll avoid it. So let him go and let go of your defensiveness.
|
bob myers
Member
66
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 08:28:37
Reply
oh yea no clothes grrrrr
|
sleeve_jones
Member
63
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 09:16:26 · Edited by: sleeve_jones
Reply
I have to say something about the stuff about underage girls. If I question the age of a girl in a picture I avoid that thread but that to me is not censorship for the law to intervene. I also do not like hidden camera stuff for the reason the "model" or subject of the photo is a victim. The girl is questionable if she can make the judgment to pose for a photo and understand the emotional and future consequences of her actions, the hidden camera the girl is not a willing participant but these are matters of real people with real world implications. When it comes to people writing fiction or posting fantasy type discussions about girls of any age it is purely text. There is no real person involved. The idea a fantasy post here can CAUSE a person to act in a real world is both insulting to everyone here and people in general. Just writing a girl's age at 16 rather than 18 means nothing nor is a drawing as long as there was no real model used for the work of art. Even if a person with real daughter says "my daughter" in a text forum there still is no victim. The only victim is when a real person is put in a sexual situation against there will. So I hope no one here is acting these fantasies out but get off your high horse in a porn forum.
|
Multi_Orgasmic Mary
Member
1003
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 10:35:04
Reply
Quoting: sleeve_jones I have to say something about the stuff about underage girls.
This isn't just you, you're just at the end of a long line of people missing the point, it's not about underage girls, incest, cutting off dicks, I don't care about any of that shit, as far as I'm concerned you can fantasize about your underage daughters all you want, you can fantasize that you're so perverted you deserve to have your dick cut off,,,what I'm saying is I don't expect to read about sewing quilts in a Hot Rod magazine, can you people be so dense that you can't figure this out for yourself, you came here for cuckolding (remember this is called "CuckoldPlace"), so keep it cuck related or go start your own dickectomy site and stop trying to hi-jack this one, what's your fuckin point?
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
251
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 12:49:56
Reply
Quoting: kimlane I love all the noncontributing lurkers coming out about this
The reason they're "coming out" is because this is a subject that's been brewing with the silent majority. Look at the other thread "Is this site scary or what". Same thing... posters are concerned about the site drifting off-course.
Their opinion isn't invalid just because they're lurkers.
Look... we can bash each other over the head ad nauseum. Sure, ANY subject under the sun can be "tied" to Cuck with enough justification. i.e. - Charles Manson had a voice in his head that "forced him to do it"... so let's start a Serial Murderer thread and someone will argue that's appropriate Cuck content.
The simple point is that it's a Cuck site. Any reasonable member would expect PRIMARILY Cuck content. Threads that are PRIMARILY other fetishes are better suited for other sites. It's really not that complicated.
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
251
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 13:04:48
Reply
PERFECT. FUCKING. EXAMPLE.
http://www.cuckoldplace.com/34_48475_0.html
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
smalldickedwimp
Member
1061
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 14:59:00
Reply
i am officially neutral on this subject for now.
i do however keep hearing mick jagger's words 'but he can't be a man because he doesn't smoke the same cigarettes as me'.
|
PalmCoastCouple
Member
251
|
# Posted: 28 Mar 2008 15:07:15
Reply
Mick Jagger is judging in that lyric. We're ALL perverts here. None of us can judge.
All we're saying is that this Marlboro.com.
If you smoke Camels perhaps Camel.com is more appropriate.
cuckold - Pronunciation - kuk-uhld - noun 1. the husband of an unfaithful wife. NOTE - It DOES NOT say: Sexually confused, submissive, sissyboy, crossdresser, cocksucker, scat eater, piss drinker, beastiality, incest or pedophilia.
|
